Fausta's blog

Faustam fortuna adiuvat
The official blog of Fausta's Blog Talk Radio show.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

The red lipstick visitors

I was checking my blog stats and found that a large number of people have recently been reading this post from last October.

Did they come because of the lips? (No, those are not my lips)

Or because of the red nail polish? (Yes, this is my hand)

Or perhaps because of the information about lead in lipstick?

We'll probably never know for sure, but thank you for your visits all the same.

Digg!

Share on Facebook

Labels: ,

Saturday, October 13, 2007

You'll pry my red lipstick "from my cold dead hands"!

UPDATED
Scroll down for updates


I've been wearing red lipstick since I was in my teens and red lipstick was not in fashion.

The reason for this was that my favorite aunt always wore red lipstick and matching red nail polish all her life and sh looked sensational. The first lipstick I ever wore was hers (I must have been two years old or so. She went out and bought me my own little-kid brand).

Well, today I get up, open my email and find this, via Agent Bedhead:
NEW PRODUCT TESTS FIND LEAD IN LIPSTICK
Toys made in China aren't the only products laced with dangerous heavy metals: lipstick manufactured in the United States and used daily by millions of American women also contains surprisingly high levels of lead, according to new product tests released today by the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. The lead tests were conducted by an independent laboratory over the month of September on red lipsticks bought in Boston, Hartford, Conn., San Francisco and Minneapolis. Top findings include:

More than half of 33 brand-name lipsticks tested (61 percent) contained detectable levels of lead, with levels ranging from 0.03 to 0.65 parts per million (ppm). None of these lipsticks listed lead as an ingredient.

One-third of the tested lipsticks exceeded the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s 0.1 ppm limit for lead in candy – a standard established to protect children from directly ingesting lead. Lipstick products, like candy, are directly ingested into the body. Nevertheless, the FDA has not set a limit for lead in lipstick, which fits with the disturbing absence of FDA regulatory oversight and enforcement capacity for the $50 billion personal care products industry.
If you follow their links they also have a question and answer section and a PDF copy of their report.

The report, you can see if you open the link, features a photo of a cute little girl and is titled "A Poison Kiss: The Problem of Lead in Lipstick". Hmmm. Remember what I was saying about "for the children" arguments the other day?

The study claims that "Women inadvertently (but harmlessly) eat about 4lbs of lipstick in a lifetime." Considering my early start, I must be working my way into my 6th lb or so. Not one of the symptoms described (learning, language and behavioral problems such as reduced school performance and increased aggression, infertility and miscarriage) have ever happened so far. However, if you try to separate me from my red lipstick it may lead to increased aggression on my part.

I read the full report and what it comes down is that it calls for yet more government intervention and regulation. Why am I not surprised?

After reading the report I've made an informed decision:
"I have only five words for you: From my cold, dead hands."

Which, by the way, will be wearing OPI Big Apple Red nail polish:


(And before you ask, that is a photo of my hand, but the red lipstick gif came from here)

Do you like red lipstick, or do you hate it? Answer the survey!

Update:
Janette emails,
Here's a link that kind of talks about what I mentioned in your comments, Fausta.
Lead in Candy Likely To Be Consumed Frequently by Small Children: Recommended Maximum Level and Enforcement Policy

The allowable lead level in candy was .5ppm until 2006 which means that all of US grew up eating a lot more lead as a tasty treat than what's currently in our lipsticks.

And we turned out fine.

Mostly.

IMHO this is just a case of another wacky "consumer's rights group" trying to get free publicity on the tailcoats of another hot story (lead in children's toys).

About the "Campaign for Safe Cosmetics"

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics is a coalition of women's, public health, labor, environmental health and consumer-rights groups.

Founding groups of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics include: Alliance for a Healthy Tomorrow, Breast Cancer Fund, Clean Water Fund, Commonweal, Environmental Working Group, Friends of the Earth, Massachusetts Breast Cancer Coalition, National Black Environmental Justice Network, National Environmental Trust, and Women's Voices for the Earth
.
And more:
Snopes had already debunked this story in 2004. But it's never too late for Safe Cosmetics to drive its agenda, isn't it?

Digg!
technorati: red lipstick
Share on Facebook

Labels: ,

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

A few thoughts on beauty

Instapundit has an item from Virginia Postrel, who posts on those Dove commercials suggesting that every woman is beautiful.

The Dove advertising campaign got launched at the Church of Oprah, where self-esteem is built on ignoring the obvious.

"Every woman is beautiful": Political correctness is now oozing out of a tube of hand lotion.

Can anyone possibly believe that "every woman is beautiful", any more than "every man is handsome"?

What are they, blind?

While the airwaves are currently filled with pictures of Anna Nicole Smith in her bad days, she was gorgeous in her Guess days.

The elderly mother of one of my friends is a most attractive woman. She has great legs even at the age of eighty, beautiful hands and great complexion. She's been married and widowed three times. She's well dressed and has a great personality. But she has Mary Wickes's face, not Ava Gardner's.

(Ava Gardner used to stay at the hotel where my father worked. Of all the famous and beautiful that visited that hotel over the decades, she was the only one that the hotel staff considered as naturally beautiful even as she aged.)

Patrick Stewart has tremendous stage presence. He is well dressed, and when I've seen him on stage he's been in great shape. He has a most sexy voice. But he's not the young Errol Flynn.

Heck, even the old Errol Flynn wasn't the young Errol Flynn.

And Errol Flynn was never Humphrey Bogart, either.

As Virginial Postrel points out,
Like the rest of the genetic lottery, beauty is unfair. Everyone falls short of perfection, but some are luckier than others.
Luck is hard.

Self-confidence is even harder.

Not every woman is beautiful. Not every man is handsome. Deal with it.

Labels: , , ,