Fausta's blog

Faustam fortuna adiuvat
The official blog of Fausta's Blog Talk Radio show.

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Why Brazil Isn't Ashamed to Exploit Its Oil

Mary Anastasia O'Grady has an excellent article in the WSJ, Why Brazil Isn't Ashamed to Exploit Its Oil. She explains why in detail, but it all boils down to this:
Brazilians understand the importance of energy to their future, while Americans do not.
Allow me to reiterate that:
The difference between the Brazilians, whose environmentalists don't complain about offshore drilling, and the US is that Petrobras is state-owned, and here in the USA oil companies are privately-owned companies, so the socialist environmentalist mindset doesn't complain about the Brazilian approach.

Congress' insistence on the federal ban on offshore oil drilling not only causes short-term effects like high gas prices, but continues to make us increasingly dependent on foreign oil producers, most of which are oppressive tyrannies, several of which also support terrorism.

At least McCain seems to have realized this. McCain Seeks to End Offshore Drilling Ban:
"We must embark on a national mission to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil," McCain told reporters yesterday. In a speech today, he plans to add that "we have untapped oil reserves of at least 21 billion barrels in the United States. But a broad federal moratorium stands in the way of energy exploration and production. . . . It is time for the federal government to lift these restrictions."
Let's hope he wakes up when it comes to ANWR, too.

Obama, however, thinks of oil drilling in these terms:
"John McCain's plan to simply drill our way out of our energy crisis is the same misguided approach backed by President Bush that has failed our families for too long and only serves to benefit the big oil companies,"
Obama doesn't seem to realize that
a. the oil is underground
b. it has to be drilled to get up to the surface
c. that's what oil companies do.
Can we "simply drill our way out of our energy crisis"? YES WE CAN.

McCain also wants federal subsidies to build nuclear power plants. While I normally oppose federal subsidies in general, this kind of large-scale infrastructure development should be a good use of taxpayer monies if appropriately managed.

Obama? He wants more regulation public utilities, and some greenhouse-gas emissions credits auction hocus-pocus. Perhaps it's all part of his Winnie the Pooh approach to things.

Share on Facebook

Labels: , , , , , ,


At 8:55 AM, Blogger Mark E. said...

In a sane world those who are responsible for high fuel price (Democrats and Republicans who are beholden to environmental nuts) would be commonly referred to as such by a media that wasn't in the tank for one political party. Instead, the American people have a constant uphill battle to find the truth because of our dishonest and partisan press.

At 4:03 PM, Anonymous Denny said...

Back in the 80's the gummint gave a tax break for those people who reinvested their dividends in electric utility companies to give them the additional capital they needed to build new power plants. Up to a certain amount of the dividend (can't remember how much) was tax free. That's the kind of incentive I would like to see now.

At 6:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

When I think of the Pooh bear going up against the Putin bear, I shudder. And I am pretty sure the European foreign policy wonks were less than impressed by the rhetoric. I guess it is part of some grand plan to improve our image in the world.

At 8:16 PM, Blogger Fausta said...

You're right Denny - that was in the 1980s, and it was a good incentive.

The Pooh against the Putin, expat, what a disaster!


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home